Last updated May 2026

Jamie vs Otter

A side-by-side comparison of Jamie and Otter — pricing, features, integrations, and where each one wins.

Jamie

privacy first notetaker

Privacy-first AI note-taker that runs locally and captures meeting notes without bots joining the call.

Visit Jamie →

Otter

transcription

AI transcription and meeting note service with real-time captions, summaries, and action-item extraction.

Visit Otter →

Pricing

Jamie

TierMonthlyPer seatIncludes
Free$0€0 per month · Start free, upgrade anytime · 10 meetings per month
Plus$21€21 per month — €250 billed annually · Great for busy professionals · Up to 20 meetings/mo
Pro$39€39 per month — €470 billed annually (Popular) · For high-volume and power users · Unlimited meetings

Otter

TierMonthlyPer seatIncludes
Basic$0Zoom, MS Teams, Google Meet · AI Chat within and across meetings · 1 lifetime audio/video file import
Pro$8.33Annual billing (Save 51%) · 1,200 in-app recording minutes · Advanced AI workflows
Business$19.99Best value · Annual billing (Save 33%) · Unlimited meetings + in-app recording
EnterpriseUnlimited custom AI workflows · Custom integrations (CRM, dialers) · Schedule a demo

Key features

Jamie

  • Privacy-first AI note-taker that runs on your device
  • No meeting bot visible to participants
  • Supports 20+ languages including German, French, Spanish
  • Custom summary templates for different meeting types
  • Works across any video conferencing platform

Otter

  • Real-time live transcription during meetings
  • OtterPilot joins Zoom, Meet, and Teams automatically
  • Speaker identification with custom vocabulary
  • Slack and CRM sharing of meeting summaries
  • Mobile app with offline recording

Where each one wins

Jamie

Strengths

  • Bot-free, on-device capture preferred for privacy-conscious teams
  • EU-based vendor with strong GDPR posture
  • Excellent multilingual support, especially European languages

Tradeoffs

  • Higher per-seat price vs cloud-only alternatives
  • Requires running the desktop app during every meeting
  • Fewer integrations than US-based market leaders

Otter

Strengths

  • Best-in-class transcription accuracy on clear English
  • Strong mobile experience for in-person meetings
  • Custom vocabulary helps for technical or jargon-heavy meetings

Tradeoffs

  • English strength doesn't extend equally to other languages
  • Tiers count minutes, not just users — high-volume costs add up
  • AI summaries less detailed than Fathom's by default